drdino.org

This is a static website with no interactive content, cookies, push notification, etc. Scroll down to Trump's AI video with my addition

Be sure to stop by, offscour.org, hosting Miki Alex Manigault's commemorative page.

29 Sep 2025 | Click here to scroll down to the first video of Creational Science series.

This is work in progress and may contain typos, etc. The domain name, drdino.org, is intentional to be a take on the dot com form, but not to imply any connection other than augment, even with risking stigma as grandiose, jealous, fanboy, p.o.s. which of course is what many or most of Charlie Kirk's fanatical idol worshipers would dismiss me as. The problem they'd have with me is that I'm not going on about the "injustice" of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion, or the "crime" thereby committed against whitey in our country ... which was built on the backs of slaves.

If anyone would inquire, I'm Caucasion, and a descendent of original (Quaker) "colonists", who were notably pacifists and anti-slavery. Ben Franklin printed abolitionist literature of Ben Lay's, who also would stand out in East Coast rainstorms with only one shoe on to protest slavery.

I never figured that I'd get so involved with the "Creationist" movement to where I'd be compelled to launch a website. I was actually surprised to see so much controversy regarding it and I thought it fairly good sign that there were so many who took enough interest to spend time & effort in criticism of the science. It's considered as enough of a threat to garner such attention, although I can't help but to wonder why, exactly. I sometimes ask people I argue with about various topics on social media: "Why does it matter to you what I think?". There have always been atheists that would be derisive of anything Christian, and of course there's been concession by The Pope himself, so official Vatican position (is now) that theory of evolution is accepted. There is another political commentator who even discussed it in a recent video, although by all other accounts he is conservative and also a fan of Charlie Kirk's.

There's the other issue, which causes my religion (Society of Friends or "Quakers", is what an English judge called George Fox back in the seventeenth century), to directly intersect with the mainstream Christian (Nationalist) politics, and that is the latter's criticism of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion policies. I've gathered, incidently, that maybe the main problem that the neo-conservatives have with the policies is due to LGBTQ+ aspect and that is the key point that I can address here. A person would have to be an idiot to not understand the "G" part, especially for men (for example here), where for whatever reason they know that they wouldn't be able to sustain a relationship with a woman. To prevent the inevitable domestic conflict they instead make decision to be homosexual, and of course that point would be repudiated by even people of neo-conservative culture since that is not the purported reason. My point is to examine the issue in philisophical light, though (if I may continue), and make the clear & obvious point that a man in the position of which I described would rather be thought of as deviant (as in "deviation") than to be considered as completely without a consensual intimate relationship with any other adult. The reasoning should be obvious.

I'd also like to include "a theory of mine", if you will, that the Bible verse of Acts 8:38 includes a descriptive word for a man that wasn't necessarily only used in an absolute literal sense that it's thought to now. The term "incel" ("involuntary celebate") is used now and the other consideration is that historically there were monasteries and convents that people could turn to if they found it impossible to assimulate into mainstream society. A person would have to be an obstinate, self-righteous jerk to not be able to understand that people get abused by other people, and if a person was victim of child abuse then the trauma they experienced could (and often does) affect their ability to always be able to maintain complete control their emotions when they're upset or "emotionally distressed", is a common term that's used. People often like for me to have a polite, civilized conversation about other humans suffering somewhere in the world and I have extreme difficulty with the game. I'm reminded of what it's like to have someone playing "typewriter" on my chest. It's annoying, to say the least. The fact that people intentionally want to calmly discuss some issue, where they'd avoid some critical element (like most immigrants are shorter in height than average); knowing it gets frustrating and induces compassionate indignation in their opponent†, and in turn find it amusing that a "liberal" will "beclown" (is the new popular label) themselves and the first one to be upset loses the argument. Schadenfreude can seem like a good thing, so people run with that, type thing.
†Fundamental attribution error

Charlie Kirk called for the elimination of American Sign Language interpreting for emergency public broadcasts because he found it distracting. He said that on 08 Jan 2025 and if his fans were serious about him being such a wonderful man then they'd go forward with championing that cause, but instead they deny it ever happened since they didn't happen to catch that particular announcement. Of course there is evidence but they're not required to review anything along those lines since Charlie Kirk isn't on trial (or whatever). He also said that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake. His point, from what I gathered, is that it was what led into the controversial Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion policies. I can segue back into that subject now.

So for sake of argument here, I can reiterate that historically there were places where a person who experienced trauma (abuse) could go live their lives out in peace, and be quote-unquote Saved. Those kind of places may still exist to some extent but not very common anymore. So the person becomes an adult and willing to work in the modern world; integrating with society at large, and be a productive, contributing member, but then can be blindsided by some callousness and bigotry. Something as simple as a company picnic, that they'd be expected to attend, could turn into a catastrophie for them, and in turn their family & loved ones, maybe their grandparents and/or siblings would be devastated with news that a person's whole life fell apart because of some "morally superior" popular coworker who has a spouse and children and beautiful house (that they'll probably lose it all themselves within a few years) decides to stage an "intervention" of some kind.

I could also take this opportunity to address the other commonly related argument about marriage where people of Christian faith will bring up a Biblical definition of the tradition and insist that same criterion should carry over to our government's law. There is also the compromise of "civil unions" which of course has also been derided by people of Christian faith, as far as I recall right now but I'm not going to research that at this time. Anyway, my position is that there is the separation of church & state and there has historically been, and still are, problems with the combination of religion and gov't, or theocracy. The point I'd like to make is that if the definition of marriage needs to be from Biblical source then why stop there? Capital punishment is still used in our country and it was recently brought up by Charlie Kirk, as well as his cohorts in reference to his killer, but Jesus said to forgive people. If the very same people will argue the contradictory issues then I'd point out that the Lord's name is not to be taken in vain and I'm going to argue that the word "vain" does not have two different definitions (as I was once told by a Lutheran pastor) but has to do with "self" (or as a form of the word "vanity") so the concept becomes apparent in that light. Incidently, there is also something about "women staying silent in church" (I'm not going to look up that right now either) but the "Religious Society of Friends" attend meetings and that is actually part of the reasoning since women are free to share what they're thinking. (If anyone ever bothered to examine the event with Jesus and the adulterous who was about to be stoned in the context of gender equality then it's clear that His point is that women have their rights too.)

You shall neither mistreat a stranger nor oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. is Exodus 22:21 KJV, which is other example of an inconsistancy with neo-conservative pervious-platform. I bring up repeatedly that the majority of immigrants are shorter than average (< 6') which is critical since becomes apparent that they get forced out of their originating country. I also mention (& get lambasted on social media, including fall-outs with old friends) that there were ex-slaves who went south after Civil War and so could have descendants re-entering the country undocumented as well as descendants of people forced out of the U.S. during depression era. It'd be next to impossible to prove that a person is not a descendant of somebody illegaly forced out. There is escalation in the neo-conservative posit where they will insist an immigrant doesn't have rights, not even acknowledging basic human rights, since that's "woke" & all that (type thing); but if it's impossible to determine whether or not a person is in the country legally or not just by looking at them, and leave it at that since it's not your job to verify their status, then that is a concession that the person has rights. The issue is that there is obvious vigilantism encouragement and there's even associated "toughness" to where anyone, including Christians, are shamed and derided as being "weak" if they aren't relentless in the Nationalistic idealogy of brutality against immigrants. When there's proliferation (rumor) of stigma of gang association without acknowledging the physical height disparity I've mentioned then that isn't Christian attitude. Intimidating people who are vulnerable and disadvantaged isn't what Jesus was/is about, as far as I can tell. The question I have is if there's a culture of people who are hedonistic (the word I'll use here), or not exactly Christian minded and are aware of that, who use the superior morality reinforcement of Christianity and knowingly figure that they'll make the tough choices that more compassionate Christians will disagree with.

I can also clarify the misunderstanding with the phrase "Sanctuary City", and point out that it's an expression used in disparaging way to describe policies of restricting local law enforcement sharing information with federal authorities with regard to immigration status. The reasoning is to provide local law enforcement ability to investigate crimes committed where victims or witnesses aren't in the country legally. Of course there would be the vehement disagreement about the necessity of anything like that since the idea is to use whatever opportunity to round them up and force them out anyway but victims could be children so it's all about being cold-blooded hypocrits all in the name of Christ (kinda thing). I'd also like to include another point, which I can use to segue back into the next paragraph's topic, that Latinos are often Christian (Catholic) leaning too so they'd be allies in the battle against transgender experimentation idealogy.

Furthermore, I'd suggest here, that by what I alluded to with the mentioning of LGBTQ, that a person who doesn't fit typical archetype of average working family man or woman, could still live their lives and be "Saved"; who's to say they couldn't? The Bible says this, that and the other thing, but yet I've already mentioned idol worshiping. What exactly does the word "vain" mean in a contextual sense? What's astonishing is that there have been many of people who could be considered one of the people that fall within the "inclusion" category, who've contributed to helping establish the modern day technology that is utilized by people in the neo-conservative culture. In other words there's a lot of self-described Christians who are ungrateful as hell. I don't think that things like "drag-queen story-time" is appropriate, just to set record straight on that issue. Aristotle brought up the idea of extremes long ago and there will be subversive people who'd want to nullify anything that's considered a reasonable compromise, is the best way I can explain that here.

I cover this same basic subject at pariahs.org too. I really have no idea of how to promote my material while maintaining a degree of respectful discretion that is warranted under the circumstances. I'm a sensitive person myself and I get irritated when people's choice is to only deliberately deride me. I've interacted and lived with people who've endured some of the worst kinds of abuse and yet I get bombarded with a slew of insults when I attempt to clarify some controversial issue on social media.

All of this is rather inconsequential in this context until the aspect of people that will utilize the unquestioned loyalty & reinforcement offered by others in religious conservative culture. There could be lunatics who feel completely at ease with blaming "woke" gov't policies for a court mandated no-contact order with their children who are in an ex-spouse's custody. This may sound like some farfetched scenario but I have evidence of the exact dynamic where a divorced man is ranting about child protective services interfering with his relationship with his children. That would be one thing if his complaints were constrained to his own personal circumstances, but he's associating other events with his grievances to imply a conspiracy against a quote-unquote faith filled family father, is what he describes himself as.

On 08 Jan 2025, Charlie Kirk's video podcast excerpt where he calls for elimination of American Sign Language interpreting for public emergency broadcasts.

29 Sep 2025, President Trump's racist AI video.

Chris Farrell

So this is what motivated me to update this website. At first I had just paid the fifteen bucks for the domain and had it redirected to one of my main sites since I wasn't all that interested in being critical of the dot com version. I did take issue with the aforementioned idol worship of Charlie Kirk, and now that I've brought him up again, I decided that I'm fine with the praise of him but my position is that he was in a Devil's Advocate phase of his life. His widow recently was chided for making the "devil's horns" hand gesture but it's fairly obvious, to me anyway, that she probably thought twice about making a fist signal. She also brought up forgiving her husband's killer and I commented around that I took that to mean that she didn't like the idea of capital punishment. (The penalty is disproportionately levied on people of color and isn't a deterrent. It's really just gov't sanctioned retaliation.)

The issue which I've mentioned is a problem is when deranged people, or mainly men with violent tendencies, will depend on expected alliance or reinforcement of their personal grievances that are anti-gov't in nature. Often it's regarding overly intrusive government idealogy but it's not really questioned as to why exactly they feel the way they do. There can be faith based independent organizations, or cults, that can become so tightly knit and self-righteous that they invent reasons to murder other people, either within their own group or outsiders, and that is an example of ritual killings, although that was often misconstrued in the past as being only pertinent to "Satanic" groups. I only mention that here because it's a relatable subject and I wanted to clarify that point. It may seem surprising that with modern day access to information and social networking that the radical idealogy of isolated groups would diminish but it seems that social media has really only helped facilitate proliferation of the practice.

In any event, I just so happened to notice a comment on a local news story about a couple women who had an altercation where one was allegedly kidnapped at gunpoint by another. The victim got away, or freed, and the woman perpetrator was chased in a car by police. The car was found but the woman wasn't captured. What caught my attention was the man's comment that included the words "Red Flag behavior" in regards to the woman perpetrator and I assumed that was a new descriptive term that white neo-conservative vigilante types were going to start using so I replied to him that the word "alleged" was used in the headline (basically). I first related the retort of his to the case in Weld County, Colorado where the sheriff misrepresented a state law in a posting he made on social media which attracted an onslaught of threatening, racist, vigilante replies.

It turned out that the man was disgruntled over lost custody and visitation (I guess) of his children. Not along the lines of being depressed and discouraged by navigating the system, but moreso being radically hostile and ranting in his posts on his Meta timeline. That too, I probably wouldn't have paid much attention to but his tirades included referrences to Christianity where he's insisting that he's being persecuted (and specifically used that word) by the county and state gov't. He insists that Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion mandates are the crux of his problem. The other odd thing was that when I went to bookmark his Meta profile in my browser I found that I had already done so months ago. It's the second time I've noticed the man, in other words. I'm not so bored and jealous that I make a point to bookmark people's Meta profiles often. He is probably escalating and making associations to his situation that aren't really related but just involve interaction with law enforcement. He thinks himself as morally superior to gov't personnel and that is actually a big "Red Flag"!

So I took some screencaptures and copied the plain text of a number of his more recent posts and comments on his own profile. My point is that it's up to people of Christian faith to maintain a degree of integrity, or at least make it clear that we disagree with radical anti-gov't idealogy. There could be plenty to debate and dissent from in regards to various policies but the fact that average people work for our gov't and it's gov't "by the people...", who are human beings and humans are not perfect so we need to work with what we have, or "within the system", as I think of it since the alternative is either anarchy or Totalitarianism.

Pretty sure I have most of the text associated with screencaptures correctly.

Chris Farrell
How do Red Flag people get past the background checks? Someone should have seen her as a RED FLAG behavior health person before all this!

Scott H
Let me guess, Chris Farrell, a "Red Flag" person is anyone who doesn't want to have a polite, civilized discussion about other human beings suffering somewhere in the world (type thing). Reality is though, if the kidnapping part is alleged then the firearm part is also alleged & the driver might've just been avoiding getting caught by police.

Suzie McMillian
A "Red Flag" person is anybody who isn't a concealed carrying vigilante, Scott Hughes. Since the police are ineffective and need defunded the purpose is to get things back to the way used to be when people like Chris could freely kill.

Chris Farrell
Scott H- it is NOT "alleged" the news fact checks law enforcement charges of kidnapping just like the Douglas County Sheriff's Office does and without an Amber Alert for 7 years, they spend hours investigating and arrest a Mother for 7 years of kidnapping. I would say that is inconsistent child protection of a state ward of the court child of divorce connected wrongful to mom DEI and VAMA mean mom protection rights! Just the facts! You see I look at it NOT from adult drama rights such as DEI rights, but from a children's rights perspective! The @Douglas County Sheriff's also arrested an assault mom for child kidnapping. I am all about children's rights and we cannot have any one of DEI or VAMA protection rights hurting our children or our parents or one of the same protected class women! Who has the protection rights between these two women?

What is on your mind Chris asks Facebook? How did my Colorado Children and I end up in such horrific seperation anxiety and attachment disruption to the point I have not really been able to raise my children, about to have a senior at ThunderRidge High School turn adult and age of of Colorado uncvil family law parent alienation. I have recently taken the time to do some deep dive investigating! For one, know my ex, a Children's Hospital Colorado South Campus, Highlands Ranch lead case manager from day one used her place of work and her state license person of public trust, manditory reporters, plus adult and pediatric health care professionals, plus Douglas County - GovernmentDouglas County School Officials like Julie Crawford, principal of Eldorado Elementary and the Principal of Goldrush Elementary Dr. Brown, to take my children away from me as a loving, caring protective faith filled father, had no means of showing a true real bad dad, needed help faking this great father as a bad dad.

Here is an example of how she did that with false allegations TWICE with her social service girlfriends of Douglas County Colorado Social Services CPS she has person email contacts with! So confident of Douglas County Social Services worker girlfiend support, she copies me at my place of work NBCUniversal! I would like National CASA / GAL Association for Children and CASA in Colorado to see this too! Same for Kansas Department for Children and Families This is what I was looking for victim mental heatlh support from High Plains Mental Health Center plus worse false accusations, really needing victim assistance more so for my kids then myself, but imagine no one ever clearing things like this up the are just clearly aburd false allegations on todays faith filled father and the false alleagations come from family tax payer paid for "pretend child protectors" in it for child protection fraud who are getting Colorado social services defunded by DOGE?

From: Mrs Farrell -@.com
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 8:38 AM
To: Ashley A @douglas.co.us
Cc: Farrell, Chris (NBCUniversal) Chris.Farrell@nbcuni.com
Subject: Fw: Confirming Olivia's Tuesday July 28th Appointment

Hi Ashley,
As you can see, Chris is continuing to be non-compliant with the original parenting plan in regards to therapy with Olivia. I had her scheduled for an appointment tomorrow, July 28th, but this appointment was cancelled by Chris as he refuses to pay for it. He also states that Olivia has not had a single session sense being with me, although that is not true, I scheduled her for an appointment on July 7th and that appointment took place at my house. It is unclear to me as to why he has cancelled her appointment for tomorrow. As you know, it is not in the best interest of Olivia to be forced into therapy with a new therapist at this time. I am hopeful that Chris will comply with the original parenting plan, and Danielle can continue to support Olivia. Please let me know your thoughts.

Mrs F.

Now I did a litte bit of background checking on Ashley on Linkedin and found out where she attended college and her degree. This because I did not feel like she was doing justice for Colorado and Douglas County - Government family tax payers and certainly not for my children or I by siding with her Children's Hospital Colorado South Campus, Highlands Ranch Manager girlfreind Case Manager who was happy to harrass me and just have me considered guilty of child neglect, working as a divorce attorney for my ex as a Douglas County Tax payer paid for child protector completely in the wrong! *Imagine a county child protection service worker family tax payer paid for actually neglecting and abusing your children in false allegations against their loving, caring, protective father!

But this was also all about retalation on this loving, caring faith filled father because I had to set the Douglas County girlfreinds of my ex down in 2015 in a jury trial they tried to get against me at my ex's divorce filing! As expected the jury easily found me innocent, my ex had to plea bargin out of it. SO Ashley and the Douglas County - Government team were akwardly embarrassed and were wanting a second shot at this loving, caring, protective father!

I have to say, if anyone in he area knows Ashley, would you please sit her down and have a talk with her about this wrong as Fort Hays State does not turn out fake child care like this! Fort Hays State University. I have seen a lot of family and freinds come out of Fort Hays State much more professional and honest, working for the good of our family children and families!

Ashley just apparently did not know the Engel and Farrell family in the area and those faith filled families and she certainly did not know me, our kids or my love and care and share of them!- Douglas County - Government Douglas County Sheriff's Office Parker Police Department Douglas County Parents Freedom Network @Colorado Child Protection Ombudsman Office Colorado State Patrol Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Colorado Parent Advocacy Network Children's Hospital Colorado North Campus, Broomfield The Colorado Attorney General's Office Family Access-Fighting for Children's Rights Colorado Parent Magazine Kansas Department for Children and Families CASA in Colorado Moms for Liberty - Douglas County, CO Stand for Children - Colorado Erin for Parental Rights 9NEWS (KUSA)

Chris Farrell
I have actually learned great deal about the people who have wrongfully been involved in my children's, my parent's life and my life from LinkedIn. Found the corrupt Colorado custody evaluator trolling my great attorney on Linkedin, looking for children and parents for collateral damage for his child custody chaos cash. This is how it works, a bunch of people want to fake best interest of your child, fake you as a bad parent, that way the get best interest of a child custody chaos cash, and child protection fraud funding! You kids are passed around for head count pretend best interest and pretend child protection, the predators of family law are out liking the family law attorney and congratulating them! You can see public school officials get involved who should know better! CASA in Colorado Kansas Department for Children and Families Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Colorado Education Association

Janella
Thinking of you Chris! Prayers!

Chris Farrell
Janella Pauls Benoit Thanks! This is more so about my kids then me, and they have it worse then I do, need our prayers too. So does my ex Shelly and Ashley. It is time for peace for our children, parents and family and this cannot go on! The faith filled family fathers like my son will hopefully be some day just deserve to be repsected and cared for too along with our son's grandchildren! I am on a mission from God here, don't like to have to go for social justice when family law judgement is a complete failure with a judge playing God between God given children and God given family, but feel like we are all put on this earth for a reason. The normal family fun childhood did not happen for my kids, and that is the most important time of their life. The did not get to have faith filled family father love, care, and share protection as it seems yet I am just another one of those white faith filled family fathers who can be pushed out where satan finds weak links in goverment areas like family law, public schools, state and county socials services, pediatric and adult health care.....all were not ethically, and morally working with this faith filled family father, BUT WORKING against my children and I. You cannot imagine the pain and agony of wanting to love and care for your kids, people have helped kidnapp them, will not allow your kids that parent love and support! Your support and prayers are so greatly appreciated I have received a lot of family and friend prayers. The "Punishment" I have recieved just for wanting to love, care for and protect my kids does need to be "PRAYED AWAY"! The frustration, the trauma, the pain for my children and I in the false wintess abuse we have been through cannot even be described! STILL to this day ONGOING...people say forgive and forget....it is still on going, thus the reason for this going social media public notice. Agan thank YOU for your prayers and support!

Chris Farrell
My ex does have a background with the Parker Police Department and the Douglas County Sheriff's Office and it is not good. Did not want to point this out publically, but there comes a time the truth must come out. I do not live at this address or anywhere in the county anymore, I needed to get away for my own safety and well being because the harrassment and false allegations were getting overly burdening and I needed to get away from the bullying out of control going on against me in the public school, the places where I tried to get pediatric care for my kids, in MY OWN HOME! Again disregard that address, it is no longer my home, I had to go find a safe place! Kansas Department for Children and Families. One of my last straws was my report to Colorado Parks and Wildlife! I could not go to Chatfield Resivior with my kids without being harrassed, antagonized and bullied, my kids were sad about that as well!

Chris Farrell
My Children and I were traumatized by this family tax payer paid for family law judge as she discriminated against the non protected, no DEI rights faith filled white loving, caring, protective father! The Colorado Attorney General's Office Colorado Parent Advocacy Network - CASA in Colorado National Parents Organization https://www.courts.state.co.us/.../Opinions/2021/21SA91.pdf

Chris Farrell
This is why I seemed to be unable to care for my children in the Colorado pubic schools like Douglas County - Government public schools. DEI...there never was a protection or priority class for the white faith filled father but mom and the LGBT girlfriends had their rights to push out the faith filled family father. No sense in the faith filled family father trying to protect his kids in the public school the protective parents like Douglas County Parents Freedom Network, and Moms for Liberty - Douglas County, CO have to call in the DOJ for public school bullying out of control including on my daughter in an Elementary school! I could not even protect myself as a loving, caring, protective faith filled white father not alone my children! Colorado Parent Advocacy Network Stand for Children - Colorado Colorado Parent Magazine

Chris Farrell
This is a link to a Jefferson County Colorado public school district meeting. My children and I have been through fairly similar public school official problematic behavior. The push out of the loving, caring, faith filled family father in Colorado public schools is REAL and combined with a lack of public school protectors for our children is not good. Watch this public school board meeting of protective parents point out public school student protection failuures one at a time. But start with a father like me who speaks up and speaks out like I do at 2:45:20 - FYI, metoo for my kids and I in the Douglas County - Government public schoool district! - https://www.youtube.com/live/FjR1g5CwAWU?feature=shared Colorado Parent Advocacy Network Protect Kids Colorado Colorado Education Association Colorado Parent Magazine Douglas County Sheriff's Office CASA in Colorado Douglas County - Government Douglas County Parents Freedom Network Stand for Children - Colorado Children's Hospital Colorado South Campus, Highlands Ranch Moms for Liberty - Douglas County, CO Kansas Department for Children and Families Colorado Freedom Force Moms for Liberty - Douglas County, CO Erin for Parental Rights

Chris Farrell
Larah Thomson ya your not a non protected white faith filled family father who can't protect yourself as a parent not alone your children!.Even the Douglas County School District of Colordo uses DEI to determine the bully and bully victim, gets it all wrong, still the DOJ is called in by protective parents for bullying out of control! Charlie just did not have priority protection rights for his kids and himself, not even his protection rights for his widow.

Chris Farrell
Julie C
May be a graphic of text

Chris Farrell
Colorado Custody Evalautors Shop for Attorneys to work with on Linkedin, don't even have a good reputation, they just want to give custody to the parent who brings in the most volunteer testmony money! - Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies https://www.denvergazette.com/.../mother-blames-parental.../ - Found my kids Colorado custody evaluator trolling my attorney that got them state best interest of our children 50/50 shared custody 5 years earlier then when he sided with mom who brought in the most public school volunters and Children's Hospital Colorado South Campus, Highlands Ranch volunteer, and boyfriend volunteer money my Kansas Department for Children and Families should have protected from having to pay for it behind my back, he was a Kansas Teachers Hall of Fame Teacher. Found this problem for my kids and I on LinkedIn too! Douglas County Sheriff's Office Douglas County Parents Freedom Network Colorado Parent Advocacy Network May be an image of text

Larah T
Chris Farrell what I know is the targeted parent normally the Respondent is most often the loser. After 6 years of 50-50 parenting my sons were falsely removed from me. During this 17 month period both sons got eating disorders. I then became an every other weekend parent until that both went to university. At age 20 and 2 months my younger son is dead directly because of his father. So I know a thing or two about the system. My son is collateral damage of the CO family court of Denver and also Arapahoe County CPS.

Below is copy of a sheriff report. I didn't think much of this either but then noticed that he had left the children's names visible which is negligent. It's supposed to vindicate him in that his ex-wife is hysterical (type) but his one daughter was alone so unsupervised. The phone conversation the deputy had with the mother is indicative of a flustered person (Chris might've been a gaslighter) and the deputy might've thought that too so let it go. The point too is that taking a child to a hospital for a skinned knee would be indicative of serious enough wound to warrant that and that is strange. Trips to emergency rooms (or a medical clinic) can take indefinite amount of time so the mother being worried about the incident would be natural.

On February 1, 2020 at approximately 2233 hours I, Deputy Z- was dispatched to xxxx M- Court in Unincorporated Douglas County, State of Colorado on report of a Trespass.

The reporting party, Christopher Farrell stated that he had to take his Daughter, - Farrell to the hospital for an injured knee. Christopher stated that when he went to the hospital, he left other Daughter, J- Farrell at the residence.

Christopher stated that when he returned home, his ex-wife’s vehicle was in his driveway. Christopher stated his ex-wife's name is Mrs F. Christopher stated that he went into his home and Mrs F was inside the home, Christopher stated that Mrs F told him she was at the Josey called and told her she was hungry. Christopher stated Mrs F was invited into the home by J-. Christopher stated that Mrs F was upset with him because when she came nto the home there was food for the children. Christopher told Mrs F to leave.

Christopher stated that he and Mrs F are curvently in Custody Court and Mrs F has been made aware that she is not to come to the residence. Christopher stated the home is owned by him only and Mrs F does not have keys or access to the residence.

Christopher he did not want to Mrs F he just wanted a report taken and for Mrs F to be advised she is nat to come to the residence.

I then contacted Mrs F via phone, and she stated that Christopher called her and told her he was taking (daughter) to the hospital. Mrs F stated that she then received a phone call from J- asking her to bring her food. Mrs F stated she brought J- food and she asked her to come inside the house. J- stated that while in the home she noticed there was not much food for the children.

I then explained to Mrs F that Christopher had called to make a report and advised her that she is not to go inside the residence. Mrs F then became upset with me and stated she was invited into the home by J- and should be more worried about Christopher not feeding the children.

I then asked Mrs F for identifying information (birthdate) for reporting purposes and she stated that if I need that information I will have to find it and hung up. A query of Mrs F’s full name in CCIC/NCIC revealed her identifying information.

It should be noted that while speaking with Christopher he showed me the inside of his refrigerator which contained enough food to feed himself and the children. The children in the home appeared to be in good health and care.

My body camera was recording at the time of this incident and may contain details and/or statements not included in this report.

Attachments:

1.BWC Z-/xx48

This was important to him for some reason. I figured that I'd include it.

He referenced a LinkedIn contact. I figured that I'd include this too.

Dr Dino 1

This is first of Creational Science series which, much to my dismay, is available on YouTube now too but wasn't when I first checked years ago. I went ahead and paid for the DVD set and the captions are available in them so that helps.

Version of Trump's AI video with helpful addition.

About Webpage & Author

One of my more recent projects was converting scanned magazine articles to digital text and one in a Colorado History magazine (printed in 1973) included an article about Junius R. Lewis. There was an injustice committed against him that entailed gender issues as well as the racism that he had to contend with. It's a fascinating story!

Plain text of letter from U.S. Veterans Affairs stating that I have a spot in a national cemetery:

June 17, 2025
Case ID: xxxxxx

Northglenn, CO 80260

Dear Scott ...:

We have reviewed your request and supporting documentation for a determination of eligibility for burial in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national cemetery in advance of need. We find that, as of the date of this letter, you are eligible for burial in a VA national cemetery.

Eligibility criteria for burial in a VA national cemetery are stated in section 2402 of Title 38 United States Code (U.S.C.), Persons eligible for interment in national cemeteries. This finding of pre-need burial eligibility does not reserve or guarantee a gravesite in a particular VA national cemetery. Burial benefits in a VA national cemetery include opening and closing of the grave, perpetual care, and a government-furnished headstone or marker, at no cost to your family.

VA will save your pre-need claim form, supporting documentation, and this decision letter in a recallable system to expedite your burial arrangements at your time of need. We encourage you to retain this information along with your other important papers. We also encourage you to discuss your burial wishes and arrangements with your family members or authorized representatives. At your time of death, should your family or personal representative request burial in a VA national cemetery, VA will confirm this finding of pre-need eligibility based on the laws in effect at that time.

I hope this information is helpful in planning for your future burial needs. Thank you for your interest in our VA national cemeteries.

Sincerely Yours,

National Cemetery Scheduling Office Director

The "Termination of Contact Letter" I received from HUD because of Miki Manigault's commemorative website. Plain text of letter:

Subject: Housing Discrimination Complaint Inquiry — Termination of Contact
HUD Inquiry Number: 761239
Dear Scott H

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUUD) administratively enforces the Fair Housing Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §3601, et seq., as amended. The Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other housing-related transactions, because of race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, national origin, and disability. On February 5, 2024, our office received the above referenced inquiry you submitted online alleging housing discrimination.

It has come to my immediate attention that you may have engaged in cyberstalking activities related to a member of our staff. While the matter has been referred to Federal Protective Service for investigation, the safety of our employees is of the utmost importance to HUD and our office will take every reasonable precaution in these situations. Your inquiry has been closed and our office is terminating contact with you as of the date of this letter. This decision is final, and HUD will no longer respond to your correspondence or telephone calls about this matter.

You may consult with a private attorney to ascertain any other right of action you may have under federal, state or local laws. Notwithstanding this termination of contact, you have the right to pursue a civil action in an appropriate U.S. district court or state court no later than two (2) years after the occurrence or the termination of an alleged discriminatory housing practice.

Sincerely,

James Whiteside
Region VIII Director

Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity

Content use (mostly) in conformance with fair use

site part of: